Rankists - Good or Bad

Geschrieben von NotFromCanada, 14.05.2017 at 23:38

there are many r8 that are comparable to r3 so beating them doesn't prove anything

the reason why there is rankism in scenarios is because

1. you don't have essential upgrades
2. most/all low ranks don't actually know how to play big nations and it could be very boring for better players if there is no challenge

Regarding scenarios - there are lot of low rank scenarios when you can gain experience before you get to play big nation. also you need to earn lot of SP for upgrades

Everyone get gangbanged. high ranks most of all because people fear them. it sucks. but you can try to prevent it by finding yourself allies at the early game and by learning who does'nt worth your trust. good luck.

Rankism has no place in 2017. Get with the current year you bigot

Anyone below the rank 20 is essentially the anti-christ. (and yes I'm implying myself as well)

Rankism helped kill the game, you excluding eager low ranks caused them to never understand how to play.

Geschrieben von Helly, 22.05.2017 at 18:47

Rankism helped kill the game, you excluding eager low ranks caused them to never understand how to play.

agree

Geschrieben von Helly, 22.05.2017 at 18:47

Rankism helped kill the game, you excluding eager low ranks caused them to never understand how to play.

Rankism is needed, especially in team games, because if they go in not having an idea what they're doing then that will cause the rest of their team to lose. If they REALLY wanted to play a bigger nation they should get another high rank who is renown in the scenario department as being a decent player to vouch for you then that'll convince the others to allow you the low rank to try.

Geschrieben von Black Vortex, 31.05.2017 at 08:27

Geschrieben von Helly, 22.05.2017 at 18:47

Rankism helped kill the game, you excluding eager low ranks caused them to never understand how to play.

Rankism is needed, especially in team games, because if they go in not having an idea what they're doing then that will cause the rest of their team to lose. If they REALLY wanted to play a bigger nation they should get another high rank who is renown in the scenario department as being a decent player to vouch for you then that'll convince the others to allow you the low rank to try.

No you have it backwards we need them they don't need us, we are invested in this community they are not. It is our job to help them. Not wait to get a vouch xD

Geschrieben von Helly, 31.05.2017 at 13:50

Geschrieben von Black Vortex, 31.05.2017 at 08:27

Geschrieben von Helly, 22.05.2017 at 18:47

Rankism helped kill the game, you excluding eager low ranks caused them to never understand how to play.

Rankism is needed, especially in team games, because if they go in not having an idea what they're doing then that will cause the rest of their team to lose. If they REALLY wanted to play a bigger nation they should get another high rank who is renown in the scenario department as being a decent player to vouch for you then that'll convince the others to allow you the low rank to try.

No you have it backwards we need them they don't need us, we are invested in this community they are not. It is our job to help them. Not wait to get a vouch xD

That's the only way that high rank would be willing to accept them, most high ranks in scenarios aren't open to low ranks, which is why I said they'd need a vouch.