To reiterate our stance on deleting duels.

Mods only delete duels under 2 occasions:

• Breaking a rule during the duel (cheating pretty much)
• Both players agree

If you DC, if you get wf'd t1, if you didn't look at the settings before picking your country, etc, we will not delete the duel. Feel free to discuss:

Geschrieben von Sid, 03.05.2022 at 08:01

If you DC, if you get wf'd t1, if you didn't look at the settings before picking your country, etc, we will not delete the duel. Feel free to discuss:

Geschrieben von smegma lover, 03.05.2022 at 13:09

Geschrieben von Sid, 03.05.2022 at 08:01

If you DC, if you get wf'd t1, if you didn't look at the settings before picking your country, etc, we will not delete the duel. Feel free to discuss:

Geschrieben von smegma lover, 03.05.2022 at 13:09

Geschrieben von Sid, 03.05.2022 at 08:01

If you DC, if you get wf'd t1, if you didn't look at the settings before picking your country, etc, we will not delete the duel. Feel free to discuss:

What in the tarnation is this

I used to record duels against low ranks just in case they ever ended up wall fucking me and rushing t2, it's happened 5 times. Every time I talked to Eagle he helped me out and deleted. When I was lower rank this really threw me off, of course any "pro player" can defend quite easily and win but lower skilled players who cannot defend are punished by this.

Since there are CW formalized rules, why not duels? why can one not apply the same rules to duels? I understand its limiting nature, but given proof and screenshots why should such noob plays be enabled by this.

I am fine with no holds bar duels, I have done them before (wfing t1, rewalling, wall bypassing , serb walling all allowed), its a fun practice. But where do we draw the line when one player operates with courtesy and the other disregards formalities. It should be both playing under the same set of rules or no rules at all.

Would you rather we assume by default no rules? how will this help settle disputes amongst duelists who play by different rule sets? This inconsistency breeds more rules via settling these disputes than simply having a standard in the first place

Geschrieben von Xenomega, 05.05.2022 at 00:11

What in the tarnation is this

I used to record duels against low ranks just in case they ever ended up wall fucking me and rushing t2, it's happened 5 times. Every time I talked to Eagle he helped me out and deleted. When I was lower rank this really threw me off, of course any "pro player" can defend quite easily and win but lower skilled players who cannot defend are punished by this.

Since there are CW formalized rules, why not duels? why can one not apply the same rules to duels? I understand its limiting nature, but given proof and screenshots why should such noob plays be enabled by this.

I am fine with no holds bar duels, I have done them before (wfing t1, rewalling, wall bypassing , serb walling all allowed), its a fun practice. But where do we draw the line when one player operates with courtesy and the other disregards formalities. It should be both playing under the same set of rules or no rules at all.

Would you rather we assume by default no rules? how will this help settle disputes amongst duelists who play by different rule sets? This inconsistency breeds more rules via settling these disputes than simply having a standard in the first place

Correct, we used to moderate duels/cws quite a lot. It became a hot button issue among mods though as grey areas swarmed every situation and differing standards on an impossible problem made for a lot of headache & biased moderating. It was a collective decision in 2018 I believe to just limit moderation down to just rule breaking or having both parties agree to delete.

It's kind of funny seeing new mods come in and try to change this not knowing how bad it was lol. Trust me, for everyone involved, it's better if mods stay out.

You can decide if someone is trustworthy enough to duel, the same way you decide in regular games if they're trustworthy to ally. If they screw you in a duel, ban them from your games and they'll have no one left to duel after their reputation falls.

Geschrieben von Xenomega, 05.05.2022 at 00:11

I used to record duels against low ranks

Maybe the problem is you dueling low ranks. A rank 10 dueling low ranks is not very nice.

I agree make scenario rules universal !!

Geschrieben von Sid, 05.05.2022 at 01:47

Geschrieben von Xenomega, 05.05.2022 at 00:11

Correct, we used to moderate duels/cws quite a lot. It became a hot button issue among mods though as grey areas swarmed every situation and differing standards on an impossible problem made for a lot of headache & biased moderating. It was a collective decision in 2018 I believe to just limit moderation down to just rule breaking or having both parties agree to delete.

It's kind of funny seeing new mods come in and try to change this not knowing how bad it was lol. Trust me, for everyone involved, it's better if mods stay out.

You can decide if someone is trustworthy enough to duel, the same way you decide in regular games if they're trustworthy to ally. If they screw you in a duel, ban them from your games and they'll have no one left to duel after their reputation falls.

I believe you on that one

Geschrieben von Witch-Doctor, 05.05.2022 at 12:19

Geschrieben von Xenomega, 05.05.2022 at 00:11

I used to record duels against low ranks

Maybe the problem is you dueling low ranks. A rank 10 dueling low ranks is not very nice.

a 54 year old buying little girl only fans and watching teen porn is not very nice either, "Yellow Rose" 🤓☠💀☠

When xenomega started atwar, he was wd's son
now hes daddy
how times change