Critical Hw Buff

Infantry get -2 attack instead of 3, tanks get -2 defence instead of 3, take out +10 cost of infantry and tank, and change the militia by deleting the -1 defence for militia and return it to -0 defence for miltia meaning no change to militia defence and have it to the original state. . ps i was playing hw , and my enemy used 6 bomber and kill all my 8 Hw tanks and lost only one bomber.

Uhhh that seems like a whole lot of buffing...

Removing the +10 cost debuff and -1 defense for militia sounds good.

I feel, though, that the -3 Infantry Attack and Tank Defense debuffs are the very core of hybrid warfare, and oppose any changes there.

Geschrieben von International, 15.04.2015 at 21:20

Removing the +10 cost debuff and -1 defense for militia sounds good.

I feel, though, that the -3 Infantry Attack and Tank Defense debuffs are the very core of hybrid warfare, and oppose any changes there.

you have unlocked hw ?

Geschrieben von The Bastard, 16.04.2015 at 07:30

you have unlocked hw ?

Erm... no?!?



Haha... ha... ha...

Maybe its better to just give inf +2 def and 1 range and tanks +2 att and 1 range give milita +2 range and lower the cost for marines and subs more

Geschrieben von International, 16.04.2015 at 08:40

Geschrieben von The Bastard, 16.04.2015 at 07:30

you have unlocked hw ?

Erm... no?!?



Haha... ha... ha...

how the hell did you try to says that a bad idea if you haven't even try HW, it's horrendous.yyou get -2attack/defence for bombers and stealth bombers

#SUPPORT I want HW to be good after all it is the most expensive strat and it is horrible! This is good post!

Fairly sure hw is not designed to be competitive, this many buffs would actually make it good/great (idk, havnt unlocked it). As most expensive strat (SP-wise) its supposed to be more of a "i can use it... but why would I?" than a "its actually good".