Buildings?

Wut is this?



new category? if so

Geschrieben von Evic, 18.03.2016 at 13:45

Wut is this?



new category? if so

Wow. AtWar just got more complicated.... Dunno if that's good or bad

Maybe units without range, so you cant move forts with blitz

Amok has said in the past he wanted to add construction projects to the game. My theory is they will cost multiple reinforcements in a city to build and offer special advantaged if completed.

Buildings would be great! With -3 range and enhancing cities' "capacities", like reinforcement, income and defense.

Let me guess infantry get a boost to enhancing income

Buildings would be awesome! Maybe one building could increase defense stats of the units garrisoned there or maybe another could even be a garrison unit like a bunker or military base.

Finally,mbe I return back to play this game...

Geschrieben von Oleg, 19.03.2016 at 01:35

Finally,mbe I return back to play this game...

Shit, Amok please remove buildings

No buildings man any noob will spam buildings from now on in 50k or 25k or 10k games.......

Geschrieben von Croat, 19.03.2016 at 04:22

Geschrieben von Oleg, 19.03.2016 at 01:35

Finally,mbe I return back to play this game...

Shit, Amok please remove buildings

Geschrieben von Croat, 19.03.2016 at 04:22

Geschrieben von Oleg, 19.03.2016 at 01:35

Shit, Amok please remove buildings

All they have to do is make them a multi turn production that you can destroy before completion add a scout unit that's really cheap that can show you If a building is in production in a city.

Edit: if they plan to add a new unit they just call buildings then burn them at the stake. That's a terrible idea.

Geschrieben von Helly, 19.03.2016 at 05:30

All they have to do is make them a multi turn production that you can destroy before completion add a scout unit that's really cheap that can show you If a building is in production in a city.

Edit: if they plan to add a new unit they just call buildings then burn them at the stake. That's a terrible idea.

send tanks for destruction. I hope it get bonus

Soon™

Geschrieben von Meester, 19.03.2016 at 06:40

Soon™

Listen here, I don't like this, tell me what "soon" means or I'll get my goons to come and fiND you. RIP

I agree with quite a few people on this thread. It will be a pain to try to defeat players who just stack their caps with defensive buildings.

The standard units are perfect IMO. Don't add anything else to them. It will just get more complicated.

Devs say they don't have much time for map editor, come out with silly things like this. I cry

Geschrieben von Helly, 19.03.2016 at 06:43

Listen here, I don't like this, tell me what "soon" means or I'll get my goons to come and fiND you. RIP

Soon™

Geschrieben von Meester, 19.03.2016 at 06:45

Geschrieben von Helly, 19.03.2016 at 06:43

Listen here, I don't like this, tell me what "soon" means or I'll get my goons to come and fiND you. RIP

Soon™

That's it you forcing my hand, expect to cry soon as a burn everything you hold dear.

Chill out everyone this will propably be a custom map/scenario thing

Please don't add this. It's easier to allow mapmakers to (un)check should ground other unit have range or not.

Geschrieben von Croat, 19.03.2016 at 04:22

Geschrieben von Oleg, 19.03.2016 at 01:35

Finally,mbe I return back to play this game...

Shit, Amok please remove buildings

Show how your face,not like whenthere is PoTy to choose :d

Geschrieben von Guest, 19.03.2016 at 09:11

Please don't add this. It's easier to allow mapmakers to (un)check should ground other unit have range or not.

the more categories the better, units kinda become a clusterfuck when you have more than 50 ground units

RIP

I hope this category just has non-instant building time, imagine having to spend several turns producing Tanks...

Geschrieben von Oleg, 19.03.2016 at 01:35

Finally,mbe I return back to play this game...

Geschrieben von Permamuted, 20.03.2016 at 05:52

Geschrieben von Oleg, 19.03.2016 at 01:35

Finally,mbe I return back to play this game...