Pass Host

This has been said many times b4, but we need a better system for passing host, it would be much simpler to choose who you want to pass to then passing and hoping it doesnt go to an afk or a troll or a dick, like in ww2 sometimes its given to the rnak 5 hitler who kicks all then plays by himself, its a waste of time not to be able to select

Support

Support.

Geschrieben von Guest, 22.08.2014 at 11:07

Support

Good idea

Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.

Bump

Yes please. Also make it possible to pass ownership before picking.

Support, we should be able to choose the host among the list of premium players that are inside the match

Support

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 24.08.2014 at 23:52

Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.

^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.

Geschrieben von Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 08:05

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 24.08.2014 at 23:52

Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.

^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.

Isn't this risk higher if you can't pick your substitute host? There s this inherent risk, that can only be avoided if you don't pass host and stay in game. Or, am I missing the point?

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 09.10.2014 at 08:12

Geschrieben von Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 08:05

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 24.08.2014 at 23:52

Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.

^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.

Isn't this risk higher if you can't pick your substitute host? There s this inherent risk, that can only be avoided if you don't pass host and stay in game. Or, am I missing the point?

True, but that limits your way off leaving/dropping the game without ensuring you to rejoin or not , which supports to not rejoin when some1 picks near you or something.

Geschrieben von Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 08:48

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 09.10.2014 at 08:12

Geschrieben von Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 08:05

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 24.08.2014 at 23:52

Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.

^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.

Isn't this risk higher if you can't pick your substitute host? There s this inherent risk, that can only be avoided if you don't pass host and stay in game. Or, am I missing the point?

True, but that limits your way off leaving/dropping the game without ensuring you to rejoin or not , which supports to not rejoin when some1 picks near you or something.

well what i was looking at this if a person has something come up and they need to leave, or if a premium player hosts a map for a non-premium player, then passing the host to who you want would be better than some afk or troll getting the host.

Being able to pass host to a certain person would be a lot easier and it wouldn't be something to difficult to add in i believe

Support