(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
16.07.2015 - 08:26 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
Well,we all know that HW is the weakest and most expensive strategy in this game. Strategy boosts inf def,tank attack and marines cost is lower. But nerfing inf attack,tank deff by -3(3v3 part) submarine attack and deff by -2 bombers and stealth attack and deffence by -2, annd at the end nerfing marines by -2 for attack and deff. This strategy is weaker than GW that is plus on that boosting range of marines. Only way that gw is weaker is deff of inf -2 and attack of tanks -2(i dont calculate attack of inf and deff of tanks cuz its -3 with HW) If this is one more stealth strategy,we must fully revamp it. All suggestians and your wieving of this strat post here. I will add all suggestions at the poll that i will make when there will be enough suggestions about revamping this strategy.
Lade...
Lade...
|
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
16.07.2015 - 08:50
I think everyone agrees HW warfare needs a boost. I really like the idea of it but the nerfs are too drastic. I think removing the sub attack and defense nerf as a whole, and removing the -1 attack to marines should prove best. To balance it though the -80 on marines could be just -60.
---- We are not the same - I am a Martian. We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
16.07.2015 - 09:07 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
I told about gw that has same idea as hw,but marines of gw arent nerfed and same cost like hw....l
Lade...
Lade...
|
16.07.2015 - 09:16
Hw is a mix between gw and the old gc, so its natural to be a little bit weaker than both to meet in the middle. I believe a strat with tanks and infantry stronger than normal but weaker than gc and marines/militia stronger than normal but weaker than gw would be a nice balance. I think my proposal will balance it out.
---- We are not the same - I am a Martian. We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
16.07.2015 - 09:26 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
ok
Lade...
Lade...
|
16.07.2015 - 11:40
I am not seeing the proposal here HW isn't bad its just hard to play strategy. We can try giving it cost boosts like -10 cost for tanks. Otherwise I think its fine as it is. I could also suggest +1 range for militia but that would make it one OP strat so I won't. I do wish people tried it a lot more though.
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
16.07.2015 - 13:36 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
lb is stronger than no strategy,hw isnt.
Lade...
Lade...
|
18.07.2015 - 08:56
I agree with minus, HW is just hard to play, not in-viable though. If you have room to expand, it is definitely doable. I guess if u want to change it give inf 2 attack so their not totally just defending and walk breaking.. But that's not that big of a deal. I honestly think it's fine as is
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
18.07.2015 - 18:07
HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
19.07.2015 - 06:59 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
Agree,but can you tell me full thinking,about inf and tanks that are nerfed,and stealths attack and def.
Lade...
Lade...
|
19.07.2015 - 07:06
You can win 2 ways that i see it, by quality or by quantity. I believe HW should be more focused on quantity then quality. It doesn't need the best stealth, it just needs a lot
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
19.07.2015 - 07:29 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
This is my opinion: Id like fully revamping it. That can be mix between SM and GC.
Lade...
Lade...
|
(deleted) Konto gelöscht |
19.07.2015 - 07:33 (deleted) Konto gelöscht
Well,marines attack 2 with hw.1 tank can kill 4 hw marines........ 20 tanks can kill 80..... Is it rly good to stay like this.......
Lade...
Lade...
|
Bist du dir sicher?