World Champion Germany !!!!!!!

I cant believe it !!!!

the 4 star for germany

great worldcup

Mario Götze thank you for this goal

Hah, we got you, italy

USA is still better

Geschrieben von Mr_Own_U, 13.07.2014 at 16:53

USA is still better

how dare you?

Congrats! They deserved it

Deutschland deutschland deutschland

Deutschland über alles!!!!!!!!

German Check List
{X} Win World Cup
{} Win World War

Geschrieben von Skittzophrenic, 14.07.2014 at 00:17

German Check List
{X} Win World Cup
{} Win World War

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

there was no win for USSR, British empire, USA, or any other country; they just gangbang on all sides both world wars.
want a fair war go head on without international help. That's where Germany will win everytime

I don't see how Messi got the golden ball. I can think of 10players that played better then him. Its just because of his name

Geschrieben von Richthofen, 14.07.2014 at 02:10

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

there was no win for USSR, British empire, USA, or any other country; they just gangbang on all sides both world wars.
want a fair war go head on without international help. That's where Germany will win everytime

Erm, when the USA invaded the Germans were already losing. They got #rekt at Moscow, Stalingrad and Leningrad. Then you know what happen? Millions and thousands of Soviet soldiers and tanks went on the offensive. 2.4 million solders participated in the attack on Army Group B (the middle one, if I remember right). It took The French, The UK, and the USA (USA may not have been needed but whatev) to fight 30 percent of the German army as yet the Soviets did better

Geschrieben von Guest, 14.07.2014 at 03:17

Geschrieben von Richthofen, 14.07.2014 at 02:10

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

there was no win for USSR, British empire, USA, or any other country; they just gangbang on all sides both world wars.
want a fair war go head on without international help. That's where Germany will win everytime

Erm, when the USA invaded the Germans were already losing. They got #rekt at Moscow, Stalingrad and Leningrad. Then you know what happen? Millions and thousands of Soviet soldiers and tanks went on the offensive. 2.4 million solders participated in the attack on Army Group B (the middle one, if I remember right). It took The French, The UK, and the USA (USA may not have been needed but whatev) to fight 30 percent of the German army as yet the Soviets did better

Your forgetting how a lot of the Soviet equipment were supplied by the Western allies. In the end the Soviets could not have won without the Western allies and vice versa.

Geschrieben von Hugosch, 14.07.2014 at 02:23

I don't see how Messi got the golden ball. I can think of 10players that played better then him. Its just because of his name

He didn't play necessarily bad, he had a good final first half. I agree though they are too rewarding towards him cuz best player. Then again if they gave it to one German player that would be unfair since the whole team deserves it because they play as a unit. Although, could've picked someone not in the semi-finals too like James Rodriguez.

Geschrieben von Guest, 14.07.2014 at 03:17

Geschrieben von Richthofen, 14.07.2014 at 02:10

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

there was no win for USSR, British empire, USA, or any other country; they just gangbang on all sides both world wars.
want a fair war go head on without international help. That's where Germany will win everytime

Erm, when the USA invaded the Germans were already losing. They got #rekt at Moscow, Stalingrad and Leningrad. Then you know what happen? Millions and thousands of Soviet soldiers and tanks went on the offensive. 2.4 million solders participated in the attack on Army Group B (the middle one, if I remember right). It took The French, The UK, and the USA (USA may not have been needed but whatev) to fight 30 percent of the German army as yet the Soviets did better

27 million losses

" they did better"

Hahahahahahaha

Geschrieben von Your Unleashed, 14.07.2014 at 04:42

Geschrieben von Guest, 14.07.2014 at 03:17

Geschrieben von Richthofen, 14.07.2014 at 02:10

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

there was no win for USSR, British empire, USA, or any other country; they just gangbang on all sides both world wars.
want a fair war go head on without international help. That's where Germany will win everytime

Erm, when the USA invaded the Germans were already losing. They got #rekt at Moscow, Stalingrad and Leningrad. Then you know what happen? Millions and thousands of Soviet soldiers and tanks went on the offensive. 2.4 million solders participated in the attack on Army Group B (the middle one, if I remember right). It took The French, The UK, and the USA (USA may not have been needed but whatev) to fight 30 percent of the German army as yet the Soviets did better

27 million losses

" they did better"

Hahahahahahaha

What did you expect? The constrips weren't well prepared, they had tougher living conditions. But even though they had poor troops, they were tough and still took Berlin.

Geschrieben von Meester, 14.07.2014 at 04:10

Geschrieben von Guest, 14.07.2014 at 03:17

Geschrieben von Richthofen, 14.07.2014 at 02:10

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

there was no win for USSR, British empire, USA, or any other country; they just gangbang on all sides both world wars.
want a fair war go head on without international help. That's where Germany will win everytime

Erm, when the USA invaded the Germans were already losing. They got #rekt at Moscow, Stalingrad and Leningrad. Then you know what happen? Millions and thousands of Soviet soldiers and tanks went on the offensive. 2.4 million solders participated in the attack on Army Group B (the middle one, if I remember right). It took The French, The UK, and the USA (USA may not have been needed but whatev) to fight 30 percent of the German army as yet the Soviets did better

Your forgetting how a lot of the Soviet equipment were supplied by the Western allies. In the end the Soviets could not have won without the Western allies and vice versa.

That could be true, but the Soviets were still the greatest contributer to the fall of Germany.

How does a worldcup football thread changes into a WW2 thread?

Anyway:

Geschrieben von The Tactician, 14.07.2014 at 04:38

He didn't play necessarily bad, he had a good final first half. I agree though they are too rewarding towards him cuz best player. Then again if they gave it to one German player that would be unfair since the whole team deserves it because they play as a unit. Although, could've picked someone not in the semi-finals too like James Rodriguez.

Well, I'm not saying Messi was bad. But he wasn't the best either, and thats whats this trophy is about. Rodriguez deserved it more then Messi or maybe even Müller or Robben.

Vril Hacked the game... Mod power

Right i think the same

messi played good but some Players was better

Germany was Klose, but now they Gotze it.

Geschrieben von UnIeashed, 14.07.2014 at 01:48

So what if they win 1 WOrld Cup USA still better they Won 2 World Wars which by my standards may be a lil bit better xaxa

Not 1 world-cup... the fourth!

Geschrieben von Hugosch, 14.07.2014 at 05:55

How does a worldcup football thread changes into a WW2 thread?

Anyway:

Geschrieben von The Tactician, 14.07.2014 at 04:38

He didn't play necessarily bad, he had a good final first half. I agree though they are too rewarding towards him cuz best player. Then again if they gave it to one German player that would be unfair since the whole team deserves it because they play as a unit. Although, could've picked someone not in the semi-finals too like James Rodriguez.

Well, I'm not saying Messi was bad. But he wasn't the best either, and thats whats this trophy is about. Rodriguez deserved it more then Messi or maybe even Müller or Robben.

Not Robben. He is a fantastic player (the best player of the tournament), but also a great artist... to many times he insinuated to have been fouled... lack of fair play!

Geschrieben von Sascha, 14.07.2014 at 07:25

Right i think the same

messi played good but some Players was better

Yes, but also the golden glove shouldn't have gone to Neuer! Keylor Navas (Costa Rica) was considered the goalie revelation of the tournament. Fifa screwed it up really hard in the end of a great tournament: "just give the golden glove and golden ball to those players that are here.... lets see... oh, ok, Neuer and Messi" WTF!

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 14.07.2014 at 08:25

Not Robben. He is a fantastic player (the best player of the tournament), but also a great artist... to many times he insinuated to have been fouled... lack of fair play!

Well, i admit that he falls easely with a lot of theater. But the same goes for Hulk, Balotelli, Pepe, etc.
Still; Messi was not the best player on this WC, and he should not be awarded. And imo Robben was better, as was Rodriguez and Müller.

Yeah, same for Neuer BTW. Navas and Ochoa (mexico) where better.

Geschrieben von Hugosch, 14.07.2014 at 08:31

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 14.07.2014 at 08:25

Not Robben. He is a fantastic player (the best player of the tournament), but also a great artist... to many times he insinuated to have been fouled... lack of fair play!

Well, i admit that he falls easely with a lot of theater. But the same goes for Hulk, Balotelli, Pepe, etc.
Still; Messi was not the best player on this WC, and he should not be awarded. And imo Robben was better, as was Rodriguez and Müller.

Yep! You are right. Even Mascherano (great player!) was muuuuuch better than Messi!

Yea I don't like how they give the awards to finalists only. Giving these awards is grading a players performance and by giving it to players from the finalist teams you are grading the player and the team while the team have already been graded by going through or not going through.

Support, Mascherano deserves it. So does Rodriguez. Shame Ochoa didn't take any awards either.

Geschrieben von The Tactician, 14.07.2014 at 09:25

Yea I don't like how they give the awards to finalists only. Giving these awards is grading a players performance and by giving it to players from the finalist teams you are grading the player and the team while the team have already been graded by going through or not going through.

Support, Mascherano deserves it. So does Rodriguez. Shame Ochoa didn't take any awards either.

Ochoa? Keylor Navas was much better.