Nice alt farm.

I think this rank 8+ player wants an unknown status! Lets give him a big applause!
Obviously he cant get in top 10 on his main account because he would be called ''noob'' if he farmed lowranked.
Status problemssss. Also it is against the rules.

Keeping a close eye on that guy ...if he suddenly starts playing a high rank and losing.

My way back proposal still stands ...make duels available only for ranks 6+

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 08:28

My way back proposal still stands ...make duels available only for ranks 6+

That is rankism..

This is the duty of the mods to actually check these kind of things. But hey, '' Mods are people Too'' remember? '' They can be bias too and lazy and blablablabla''

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 08:28

My way back proposal still stands ...make duels available only for ranks 6+

That is rankism..

This is the duty of the mods to actually check these kind of things. But hey, '' Mods are people Too'' remember? '' They can be bias too and lazy and blablablabla''

Don't take my post out of its correct context.

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:32

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 08:28

My way back proposal still stands ...make duels available only for ranks 6+

That is rankism..

This is the duty of the mods to actually check these kind of things. But hey, '' Mods are people Too'' remember? '' They can be bias too and lazy and blablablabla''

Don't take my post out of its correct context.

I didn't

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:32

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 08:28

My way back proposal still stands ...make duels available only for ranks 6+

That is rankism..

This is the duty of the mods to actually check these kind of things. But hey, '' Mods are people Too'' remember? '' They can be bias too and lazy and blablablabla''

Don't take my post out of its correct context.

He kind of has a point, you know.

If the moderators can no longer fulfill their obligations, then it is time that we start looking into alternatives. Either replace the current moderators or, suitable candidates not being available, hire new ones.

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:42

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:32

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

Don't take my post out of its correct context.

I didn't

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 00:00

Geschrieben von Azula., 11.06.2015 at 00:00

"They are mods. With power comes responsibility right, so their is no excuse."

I am talking about the players side, the way we should be thinking. Topics about their discipline are not addressed in this post.

Read the whole post...

Geschrieben von International, 11.06.2015 at 08:46

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:32

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 08:28

My way back proposal still stands ...make duels available only for ranks 6+

That is rankism..

This is the duty of the mods to actually check these kind of things. But hey, '' Mods are people Too'' remember? '' They can be bias too and lazy and blablablabla''

Don't take my post out of its correct context.

He kind of has a point, you know.

If the moderators can no longer fulfill their obligations, then it is time that we start looking into alternatives. Either replace the current moderators or, suitable candidates not being available, hire new ones.

I agree with you to a point, but I don't want MY POST to be brought out of its own context... To mean something it isn't supposed to.

Maybe it would be a good idea to report to a mod so it may get taken care of, rather then make a public post shaming them. Seems kinda counterintuitive.

Go ted go !

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:48

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:42

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:32

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

Don't take my post out of its correct context.

I didn't

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 00:00

Geschrieben von Azula., 11.06.2015 at 00:00

"They are mods. With power comes responsibility right, so their is no excuse."

I am talking about the players side, the way we should be thinking. Topics about their discipline are not addressed in this post.

Read the whole post...

Sorry but your whole post is pretty hard confusing to read, first of all, if judges,policemen, firefigthers,medics,doctors. All used the, '' we are human too'' excuse then all the world would've been a big chaos, and people would be sent innocent to jail or killed by policemen for almost no reason, (happend alrdy in america, but thats not the point).
Yes this is outrageous to compare these things with AW, but if the mods think its getting to hard for them, they could've resign and leave moderationhood, but no most of them wont, because otherwise they cant abuse those powers they have, or ban/mute people who talk ''shit'' about their clan.

Geschrieben von Google, 11.06.2015 at 08:51

Maybe it would be a good idea to report to a mod so it may get taken care of, rather then make a public post shaming them. Seems kinda counterintuitive.

I am not shaming them, by making this post all of AW including the mods can see this, and will be aware of this problem and maybe refuse to duel this dude, even the low ranks who might read this one.
And by pming the mods one by one I won't be sure if any of them will read this.

But lets not turn this thread into a moderation talking thread, we've enough of those.

K, I don't want to create flamewars over this subject. I remove myself from this.

BAN HAMMER

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

That is rankism..

Nothing wrong with ranksism ...we use positive ranksism all the time when making CW's etc.

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 09:01

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:30

That is rankism..

Nothing wrong with ranksism ...we use positive ranksism all the time when making CW's etc.

>we
Don't talk for me pls.
No need for rankism anymore, since nowadays rank 9 skills can be compared to rank 5 skills (:
Not to mention about the rank 11's >:D xaxax

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 09:07

since nowadays rank 9 skills can be compared to rank 5 skills (:

Awww cmon mate ...ur not that bad.

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 09:14

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 09:07

since nowadays rank 9 skills can be compared to rank 5 skills (:

Awww cmon mate ...ur not that bad.

xaxaxa gfy, im more compared to rank 15's man

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 09:16

xaxaxa gfy, im more compared to rank 15's man

Ok i admit you are right ...your skills are comparable to rank 15's...

None existent.

Geschrieben von Goblin, 11.06.2015 at 09:20

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 09:16

xaxaxa gfy, im more compared to rank 15's man

Ok i admit you are right ...your skills are comparable to rank 15's...

None existent.

That was the joke..

I agree I propose we remove seasonal elo all together so something like this will never happen again! After all how can a low rank top the elo charts? Even if he is farming noob!

Geschrieben von Meester, 11.06.2015 at 10:35

I agree I propose we remove seasonal elo all together so something like this will never happen again! After all how can a low rank top the elo charts? Even if he is farming noob!

Well I dont really agree on removing seasonal elo, since its new to this game and actually brought us alot of activity in duels, since lately clanwars are pretty boring (Reasons of this you can find in multiple comments of mine in other threads.), And in every system you have some people who like to ruin it for the others.. don't punish the rest for it, just simply punish the persons exploiting/ruining this system.

Back to the topic:

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:17

-blabla snip-
Also it is against the rules.

What rule?

Zitat:

Game Behavior
3. The term "Farming" is used to describe the process of playing a game with the sole purpose of gaining SP or ELO. This is considered cheating and exploitative and is not allowed. For example: Joining a game with 2 accounts, playing with first and second coalitions, playing or creating a scenario/map for gaining SP or ELO only.

or

Zitat:

Game Accounts
16. Registering an alternate account for the purpose of disobeying the rules or to avoid punishment of your main account is not permitted. Alternate accounts created for this purpose will receive permanent bans, and this may incur additional action regarding the member's main account.

Maybe here:

Zitat:

These Rules and Guidelines can change at the discretion of moderators as necessary to best benefit the community and to cultivate an atmosphere appropriate to a gaming environment. There will always be areas that will be handled on a per incident basis by moderators. Even when not specified, staff has the sole right and final judgement of how to interpret and apply these Rules and Guidelines to any specific circumstance and situation, including proper punishment. The rules may, at any time, be applied or changed by any moderator or admin if they feel right. Relying on any inadequacies or deficiencies within the rules is therefore useless.

Being looked into.

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 11.06.2015 at 11:49

Back to the topic:

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 08:17

-blabla snip-
Also it is against the rules.

What rule?

Zitat:

Game Behavior
3. The term "Farming" is used to describe the process of playing a game with the sole purpose of gaining SP or ELO. This is considered cheating and exploitative and is not allowed. For example: Joining a game with 2 accounts, playing with first and second coalitions, playing or creating a scenario/map for gaining SP or ELO only.

or

Zitat:

Game Accounts
16. Registering an alternate account for the purpose of disobeying the rules or to avoid punishment of your main account is not permitted. Alternate accounts created for this purpose will receive permanent bans, and this may incur additional action regarding the member's main account.

Maybe here:

Zitat:

These Rules and Guidelines can change at the discretion of moderators as necessary to best benefit the community and to cultivate an atmosphere appropriate to a gaming environment. There will always be areas that will be handled on a per incident basis by moderators. Even when not specified, staff has the sole right and final judgement of how to interpret and apply these Rules and Guidelines to any specific circumstance and situation, including proper punishment. The rules may, at any time, be applied or changed by any moderator or admin if they feel right. Relying on any inadequacies or deficiencies within the rules is therefore useless.

Being looked into.

Wasn't it against the rules to farm sp/elo/cw's on alts?

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 11:52

Wasn't it against the rules to farm sp/elo/cw's on alts?

Is he really farming? Formally not, because he is using the same tools as the adversary. The "only" difference is that he has more knowledge in using the tools. The wolf dressed as sheep.

It's just a game.

take it easy.

1255 will mean nothing at the end of the season (ref to last season

Agree to make duels available only for ranks 6+

and some of them (ppl who lost) are alts too

Geschrieben von Columna Durruti, 11.06.2015 at 11:56

Geschrieben von Waffel, 11.06.2015 at 11:52

Wasn't it against the rules to farm sp/elo/cw's on alts?

Is he really farming? Formally not, because he is using the same tools as the adversary. The "only" difference is that he has more knowledge in using the tools. The wolf dressed as sheep.

This is why I made the thread? Is he an alt or not? You can technically call it farm, because he is taking elo from people who barrely know anything about this game in the beginnin and he is just exploiting that.

Geschrieben von ted201501, 11.06.2015 at 11:56

It's just a game.

take it easy.

1255 will mean nothing at the end of the season (ref to last season

Doesn't justify your actions.