Hole Premium um die Werbung zu unterdrücken
Beiträge: 12   Besucht von: 68 users
30.06.2012 - 12:45
Decrease the range of their air transport. I don't know how far they can go, but if you made them have significantly less range than bombers, the SM players wouldn't be able to cap cities so easy.

No more 1 militia 100 bombers stacks.

Bombers would destroy a cities defenses 1 turn, and on the 2nd turn the AT could catch up and cap the city. This would in effect make it take TWO turns for sm players to cap extremely long distance cities, while they would still be able to capture closer cities like in the normal strategies. It sounds like a good idea to me.
----
You may not have heard of me yet. It doesn't matter; you will soon enough.
Lade...
Lade...
30.06.2012 - 13:31
Air transports already have a notably slower speed than bombers to the point that SM players do have to take it into account and move their bombers slightly slower rather than just moving them separate.
----
~goodnamesalltaken~
Lade...
Lade...
30.06.2012 - 14:36
So they just steamroll you a little bit slower.
What the bomber needs is an attack nerf, 1 point or two should do it.
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
Lade...
Lade...
30.06.2012 - 14:43
What it needs is to go from $130 to $140 per bomber, so cost is actually a factor again. Right now SM expands fast enough that cost doesn't affect them much, even though it's supposed to be an expensive strategy.
----
~goodnamesalltaken~
Lade...
Lade...
02.07.2012 - 12:13
Geschrieben von Gking19, 30.06.2012 at 14:36

So they just steamroll you a little bit slower.
What the bomber needs is an attack nerf, 1 point or two should do it.

No ofcourse not,that would be the same as a normal bomber (6 attack), SM wont stand a chance against GC infantry or pd.
----
Victorious Secret - sexiest cln of atWar
Horny Christmas & Fappy New Year Everyone!!
Lade...
Lade...
02.07.2012 - 12:19
Geschrieben von goodnames679, 30.06.2012 at 14:43

What it needs is to go from $130 to $140 per bomber, so cost is actually a factor again. Right now SM expands fast enough that cost doesn't affect them much, even though it's supposed to be an expensive strategy.


If SM does get a nerf, then I agree with this
----
The funny thing about this is by the time you realize that this is completely pointless, it's too late to stop reading.
Lade...
Lade...
02.07.2012 - 12:19
Geschrieben von AirForCe, 02.07.2012 at 12:13

Geschrieben von Gking19, 30.06.2012 at 14:36

So they just steamroll you a little bit slower.
What the bomber needs is an attack nerf, 1 point or two should do it.

No ofcourse not,that would be the same as a normal bomber (6 attack), SM wont stand a chance against GC infantry or pd.


Then do what Hattops suggested, increasing the price of bombers.
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
Lade...
Lade...
25.12.2013 - 17:37
No support this would make SM useless.
Lade...
Lade...
25.12.2013 - 18:46
No support.
----
It's not the end.

Lade...
Lade...
25.12.2013 - 19:23
 Soul
Geschrieben von Mr_Own_U, 25.12.2013 at 18:46

No support.
----
Geschrieben von Amok, 12.03.2012 at 07:05

Why? It's much easier with the popup thingie buttons...


Geschrieben von Amok, 15.05.2013 at 06:51

Wow man, you're so wrong, I don't even know where to begin with
Lade...
Lade...
25.12.2013 - 19:40
30.06.2012 at 12:45 - pls lol
Lade...
Lade...
25.12.2013 - 20:15
Locked.
Lade...
Lade...
atWar

About Us
Contact

AGB | Servicebedingungen | Banner | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Bewirb dich

Empfehle uns weiter