How privileged are you?
Beiträge: 72
Besucht von: 94 users
loling even more hard bullet for MOD!!
----      
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
baby_bullet86 Konto gelöscht |
|
Black Shark Konto gelöscht |
|
baby_bullet86 Konto gelöscht |
|
Apology accepted.
---- "In atWar you either die a hero or live long enough to ally fag and gang bang some poor bastards." ~Goblin "In this game, everyone is hated." ~Xenosapien
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
why are you so friendly since you dropped the soap? i hoped to have some fun D=
----  
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
|
145. Truly, I am blessed. This little gimmick I've seen always makes me laugh. It truly represents everything that is wrong with socially progressive politics. One of its core values is victimisation and identity politics despite the fact they seek a victimless society where everyone sees eachother as the same. These social justice warrior charts show how leftism at its very core does not seek a meritocratic system. It celebrates its very worst behavioural types while jeering at those who are the most successful or 'normal.' To be a heterosexual, european male means you are somehow inherently evil. In other words if you are a product of an evolutionary development which designed you to act in a specific manner developed over millions of years, YOU are the problem. On the other hand, if you are an unemployed, skilless, unproductive, gender dysmorphic, crippled, homosexual midget, you are the appex of leftist efficiency and value. That is how fundamentally fucked up social progressives are.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
HOLY SHIT!  http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/archive/b/b5/20120914120348!Exploding-head.gif (Edited by CD. Viewing the image above is on own risk.) Edit: Its an exploding head from a mid 80s movie with as much realism as a pink watermelon falling on the floor. CD is wussy cat. Strike? More like ... (Edited by CD. Dont be a meany, im scared of horror films and ghost trains)
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
No, just that you are not subject of specific discriminatory mechanisms. Or, to say it differently, you are less subaltern than non-heterosexual, European males.
Not the problem, but rather the beneficiary of historical political economy (power and structures of power).
Not of efficiency but subject to specific policies to close the social gaps. Affirmative actions, population specific policies, incentives, compensations, etc.
---- 
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
But I am, quite openly. I am barred from freely associating. Freedom of association was a core value in all nations, borders, tribes. It was a paramount feature of the US constitution. It meant communities were created from voluntary association. If association isn't voluntary, it creates friction. In the USA, there are multiple levels of open discrimination against whites, white males in particular. Affirmative action in Education, Employment, Government. Hate crime laws which do not protect white citizens. Eric Holder, Justice department head believe it isnt possible to actually commit a hate crime against white peoples despite 90% of black/white violent crime victims being white. There is a clear and obvious aggression directed against whites yet the law claims it cannot exist. People like you claim such hatred cannot exist due to whites being atop the 'power structure.' And why were Whites at the top in America? Why are Turks at the top in Turkey? Why are the Han Chinese at the top in China? I see no one complaining about other ethnic groups, tribes and nations practicing what Europeans did? The only difference is we are more recent. Just over a century ago, Turks were violating Slavic and Hellenic women in South East Europe. Yet these people who have suffered over seven centuries of open 'discrimination' would simply be called 'White' under your own rules. Even the idea of claiming 'whites' are higher up the food chain. Should Serbs be given preferential treatment in the USA? Seven centuries is a lot longer than Black slavery. Slavery enacted by Blacks themselves. Arabs were enslaving people right up until the late 1800s, why are they suddenly considered lesser despite 1300 YEARS of domination?
Why is European colonialism the only criteria in historical 'discrimination?' Are the previous 3000 years which led to that era completely ignored? Oh yes, sweep it under the rug, we don't need to remind ourselves of the Arabs ethnically cleansing Hellenic's Europeans, or the Mongol/Turkic enslavement of Europeans? Or the Arab slave trade? Or the countless other events in History where humans did what humans do? NOPE. But when its DA WHITE MAN, its suddenly an Abomination and all history prior to the 1800s is ignored. The most insulting part is this idea that a person from across the world can move to almost ANY White majority nation and be given citizenship, education, healthcare, equal treatment, free water, welfare, housing, police services, fire services, employment protection and YET, Whites are considered the most bigoted, hateful and privileged. Yet if a White person moved to the vast majority of Non-White countries, they would not be given the majority of these things. A Pakistani girl who moves to Australia will be treated far better than a White Aussie girl moving to Pakistan.
So are all other ethnic groups that exist today. I see no issue with being the appex predator. We are where we are through generations of hard work, labor and strife. I doubt a single Non-White country feels any shame for the actions of their ancestors nor would they allow someone to claim they should be punished for those actions of the ancient or recent past.
Precisely. You are one of these 'fucked up' social progressives. There isn't a single logical reason for your basic ideals. It provides no happiness, no incentive, no merit. It claims to fight discrimination while openly discriminating. Its fundamentally flawed and it cant even see its own hypocrisy. Compensation? Are you serious? Mongolia would be bankrupt for several centuries to pay off such compensation for their 'ancestral crimes.' Will the Turks be paying the Slavs? Do the Japanese owe the Ainu? You worship the most inefficient. You celebrate its inefficiency. Even when people complain, you simply claim they are privileged and should accept your clearly detrimental policies. Face the facts. A European Heterosexual Male IN Europe and other European majority nations is the evolutionary apex. His labor, his genetics, his community and culture within his borders are evolutionary designed. An unemployed, skilless, unproductive, gender dysmorphic, crippled, homosexual midget is far less evolutionary adapted to such an environment. One is more efficient and productive than the other, especially in the ultra competitive world we live in. It is utterly illogical to claim one with higher evolutionary merit should be punished over one with less. It makes no sense and has no benefits to any involved.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
|
Tik i believe the newest model, the bisexual human,(in many colours) is the most evolutionary adapted and advanced model.
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Heterosexuals have more children than bi sexuals and homosexuals. That is evolutionary superiority. Homosexual and Bi sexuals have higher STDs, depression, suicide, body dysmorphia, pedophillic desires, higher unemployment. How is this more adaptive to society when it is highly unproductive and inefficient? Dont blame society. Similar statistics are seen across very different political enviroments. Even if it were society, why should the vast, vast, vast majority of higher productive citizens adapt to the lesser productive ones? Fear of nuclear war is not a justification for your ideal. In actual fact, your ideal is more likely to create such a war due to enforcing unnatural and detrimental policies to a population that does not want them.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
This was funny
----  
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
|
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Strawman. It was a discussion on efficiency and evolutionary development. Heterosexual, Skilled, Intelligent Homogenus society is preferred. The claim that this model is somehow inefficient makes no sense whatsoever and there is not a single argument against such a model being preferred.
The riots 'daily' is rubbish but the rest I mostly agree with. It's a model of social democracy created by social progressives. Britain is the way it is because of social progressives just like CD who seek an unattainable Equality. Progressive socialism and Neo Liberalism did this to Great Britain, not social conservatism or social nationalism.
Blaming who? This was a discussion on the ills of Social Democratic and Socially Progressive ideals. Immigration was only mentioned as an example of how ridiculous the idea of the evil bigoted White Man is.
Why dont you ask that to CD or even yourself? What a stupid statement when this entire forum is filled with you 'proving something.' Dont make Pro-Soviet threads then and dont call yourself Tito or tell us you are a 9/10. Do you even read what you say before you post it?
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Gardevoir, at Age 17: No notable Depression, or any other kind of notable mental illness. No desires beyond that of normalcy for my sexual preferences. Employed. Much higher general knowledge of almost every subject compared to the general populace in comparison to my relative age. Much higher reaction time, sensory development, and logical reasoning in comparison to the general populace to my relative age. I believe your assertion is based moreso on stereotypes, rather than personal experiences with gays (Note: I said gays, not the flaming faggots who fuck like rabbits and go out in the street dressed in cum and nail polish). See, you may have more children, yet that is not stopping me from having them if it is necessary. I would also only have one to two, considering a good father has to balance the time to be with them as much as he possibly can, or else they will end up being [b]degenerates/b]. Quality always beats out quantity, as even you have stated numerous times that you believe a good majority of humanity is stupid an rabid. I blame this on lack of parenting, or in your case, too many fucking children to take care of. So in actuality: If I have one child later in life, that I care for and teach a non-biased view of the world, as well as instill the general knowledge of countless subjects within him/her, whilst also retaining my current stance in the leaderboard of man, I'm actually much, much evolutionarily superior to you. How so? I may swing both ways, but if I can produce a child better than anything you could come up with, as well retaining my current status, you will have absolutely nothing to say you're superior to me with. Now, this is also a one-case scenario, there are obviously many different factors that go into an equation like this. So to say that gays as a whole are superior if they had one child and acted as I do is essentially ludicrous, but saying that straight people are also superior is just as ludicrous in the long run.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Why the hell are you employed at the age of 17?
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Because it is true. African brains are 5% smaller than European brains and 6% smaller than East Asian brains. Its a fact. Here's a liberal anthropologist actually admitting it though he claims this has no impact on intelligence, without any backing other than his own opinion. African brains are smaller than European and East Asian ones. Its a fact. Deal with it. http://news.rutgers.edu/issue.2012-02-02.7844909214/article.2012-02-14.7247023894#.U3jalaxcOPs
I already pointed out the issues with Homosexuality. Norway is supposedly more tolerant yet homosexuals have the same issues in the USA as they do in Norway and Sweden. Homosexuality is the issue, not society. And no, Norway isn't doing fine, along with Sweden, its crime levels are increasing due to immigration. Norway also depends on its oil. Everything that Norway is built upon is based on its Homogeneous, Heterosexual Nordic Male dominated history. Clearly its been a benefit to them.
They are skilled and they are quite homogeneous, especially in Western Russia where most Russian income comes from. Russia is healing from decades of communism.
No, just White Majorities being influenced by social progressive policies. Very, very, very few Non White majorities follow social progressive ideals. Nor do they feel any guilt for ancestral aggression. They are mostly homogenous, not perfect but better off being homogeneous than mixed.
Are you claiming a society headed by Heterosexual, Homogeneous Males isn't preferred? Just about every civilization in human history has followed this precise pattern. How is it not preferred?
No shit Sherlock. I thought you worked that out months ago.
Because people are not equal. They have different attributes, different qualities, different capabilities. There are races, sub groups, cultures and within these criteria are the individual genetics which set limits upon human capabilities. You are demanding Equality in the Animal Kingdom. How is that even possible? It isn't. Average capability is only possibly in a homogeneous society of people with similar genetics and cultural identity. With different cultures and genetic groups, the ability to give a level playing field to all will diminish. You cannot attain what you want with different races, cultures and languages. Sameness is a strength, not diversity. There is no argument against this, there isn't. Social progressivism has no benefits. Its hypocritical and openly targets a specific group and history while ignoring all others.
What the fuck am I reading? The mongols hold the number one spot for the greatest drop in WORLD population in human history. Industrial warfare only touches the level of rape and death the Mongols committed in their short time. Most of Eurasia, except for India, was completely devoid of life due to the Mongols. The entire population of Persia and China was obliterated. Then you ignore 1300 years of Islamic Arab aggression?
Wow. Just wow. So when Arabs enslaves MILLIONS of Europeans, Africans and South Asians. Its honorable, noble and great but when Whites buy Africans from African slavers, its suddenly oppressive and evil. What a hypocritical, bias and completely illogical viewpoint to hold. I don't remember the Whites cutting off African balls. I don't remember them keeping large harems. European slavery has arguably been the most liberal form of slavery in human history. Nowhere else in human History other than possibly Rome were slaves given such civil rights and lifestyle. Arabs ethnically cleansed ALL Hellenic Europeans from North Africa and the Mediterranean islands. They annihilated the Visigoths and dominated South Eastern Slavs and Greeks for centuries. To diminish such obvious 'discrimination' over a millenia as something positive is insane. This doesn't include the history of multiple civilizations over several millenia committing equally aggressive policies. Its is very arguable that European Colonialism has been the least oppressive imperialism throughout human history. But that's a different argument and the point I made was clear. There is no moral high ground and anyone who dares claim there is has a deep bias perspective. To claim European imperialism is somehow exceptional compared to all other human history and that only Europeans should be be punished or singled out is utterly ridiculous.
Stick to the topic.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
You are living, breathing proof of the social damage Homoseuxality and emasculation does to the male psyche. No notable depression? Today, maybe. But you go into them at the drop of a hat.
Homosexuality is a mental illness and was clarified as such for centuries.
None of this has any relevance to Homosexuality. Thats simply your genetics. Homosexuality hinders your capability.
And yet you likely wont. Nor do most homosexuals.
So barely replacing yourself. Like I said, unproductive. Average famillies should be 5-6 children.
And yet White Americans and Brits had huge famillies with better skills, healthier, happier while living in poverty. Number of children isnt the issue.
You arent a man. You are a boy.
I dont even know what to say to such a childish statement. Ive already shown why homosexuality and bisexuality is clearly inefficient and unproductive. This isnt a case by case study nor am I picking out individuals. You have a whole laundry list of problems and your idea of having one superchild is ridiculous as they are far more likely to be unhappy as a single child. Large famillies with socially conservative male/female parents are much happier and more productive. They are the evolutionary product human beings are supposed to be.
Failure to replace your numbers is NOT evolutionary superiority. THose who have more children have the edge. This is fact. Youc all yourself intelligent but you are in actual fact, very fucking dumb if you cant understand basic math. If you dont replace your numbers, you get replaced and dominated. You are such a fucking child with a childish ego and a childish viewpoint. Go back to kiddy land and let the adults talk.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
yea, slavery was bad and all (stpuid frenchies, brits and spanish!) but the arabs had slavery even before the european colonies, in the 14th century
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Wrong country, wrong continent. Belgians cut off Congolese African hands. Almost all other European powers condemned such action. Regardless, the Belgian Congo was a developing colonial territory, despite the brutality of the Belgians, Congolese Africans still lived far safer lives than their previous lifestyle of near extermination from tribal warfare. Many congolese were and still are upset that the European powers left. Now the Congo has resorted back to its original state of exterminationary tribal warfare.
African slaves in America were freed. WHile they were slaves, they were given far better treatment than any other slaves in the world. Belgian Congo is a unique event which didnt last long as Belgium was heavily punished geo politically for doing that. If not for the White Man from Britain and Russia, slavery would be rampant among central Asia and North Africa.
Are you saying Arab slavery is a modern trait? Barbary Pirates were ensalving entire coastal villages from Europe for centuries before that. Arabs were ensalved East Africans as far back as the 700s and only stopped after the British abolished it. Slavery has been common across the world for thousands of years.
There never will be. Thats not how geo politics works. These interests in Africa are purely multi national. China and Russia have been doing the same thing as the Western Europeans. Russia interferes with the buisness of East Asia and South America. China interferes in East Asia. Why do you always single out Europeans but ignore the rest of the world doing exactly the same thing? Why do you play down aggressiveness among other non European groups? Its the same argument over and over. Europeans are singled out for aggression yet aggression across the world over thousands of years of history is ignored. European impeirlaism was no less brutal than Eurasian, Africa or South American history. Aztecs pulled out the hearts of prisoners of war, the Mughals brutalised Hindis in India, the Han Chinese annhilated its competitors. Mongols, Turks, Arabs. Empires across the globe. Yet ONLY the White Man is singled out for ancestral actions. This is blatant hypocrisy and as I said. Anyone that dares take the moral high ground has a deep bias. Who are you to dare claim a moral high ground over human history? Humanity isnt flowers and rainbows. Its conquering and claiming. Should white peoples just sit back and wait to be conquered or should they themselves conquer for self interest?
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
|
Why does every fucking thread go off topic about serbs and Yugoslavia and croats and the Soviet union? >:(
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
I do love how Tito just ignores statements when they prove him wrong. He calls me an idiot for claiming different brain sizes and its a scientific fact. Are you going to admit you were wrong, Tito? So much for your equality. If you cant understand how a 5% brain size difference is significant then its no wonder you are a confused, Jewish, Christian, White Hating communist.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Because Tito. Hes gone completely off topic and spouting the same rhetoric ive shown to be false time and time again. Saying the White Mna is evil is perfectly fine but if I dare say anything negative about Jews, ill get muted for hate speech. Then again, CD and his ilk are openly socially progressive communists who think Whites are inherently evil so to them its fine.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
A normal human being should question his existence whenever the time comes. Blindly following and producing is not natural for our species, nor needed. My bouts of sadness had arisen in these times, though after careful reasoning and pondering, I've come to the conclusion that I no longer need to question certain aspects of life for the time being. Case in point: I'm well on my way to making a name for myself, as well as bank, during my first few years of my proposed career- which, I am guaranteed, due to it's high demand, and my extremely professional skills within it. So, tell me again: is Depression really a terrible thing, if it motivates you to go this far? Or are you still generalizing- and empowering- the ideal that all depressed people are useless because they aren't operating at 100% efficiency? ---
Yes, and many other socially normal, as well as beneficial chemical imbalances are illnesses. You see: There is no beneficial factor in a wife and baby-maker to me, nor will there ever be. Why waste my time with such a different, non-applicable person, when I can spend my time with a social brother I find to be bound by loyalty and camaraderie? I can apply this same logic to any woman who meets these standards, of course, which is why I am bisexual, though as we both know, woman of this caliber are rare, and even more rarely will they honestly love you for you, as naturally love between a man and women does not exist beyond primal needs and urges, though as love between two partners of the same gender is practically a man-made concept, the loyalty and camaraderie factors play in much more wholly. If Homosexuality is truly a mental illness, why do you play up the superficial and generally hive-like mentality of our predecessors so very much? ---
Genetics? No. My current state is the years of logical thinking, training, and living I've experienced, along with the help of all that I've come into contact with. My Genetics are nothing above normal; I alone has been the resultant factor in who I have become, as I have absolutely no relationships with the opinions, personalities, knowledge, nor attributes of anyone I'm genetically related to, besides looks. I've built a marble spire atop my foundations of soil and grass. ---
As I stated previously: If it is necessary. I shall do so. And, seeing as I've already stated that I attribute my being to my own accomplishments, having a blood-born child would not necessarily pass on these traits by default. No, my child will be that of the message I leave once my time is over. I find that to be more accomplishing and much, much more beneficial to all than simply passing on my seed. In any case, however, the preservation of my bloodline will be guaranteed in many forms, so rest assured that the concept of logical procreation has not rested itself to deteriorate in my mind. ---
Five to Six children? Surely you would be an extremely terrible father if you wish to work, spend time with your wife, and then each child individually, atop of every other daily routine, outing, and other event that takes place in a day. Having more than two children does not work for your favor in America, and I'm sure it does not in Britbongland, either. Simply passing your seed along merits absolutely nothing if you do not have the time to teach them who they are. I give a man $1,000,000. What does he do? He pisses it all away, obviously. Though, if I were to instruct him how he can keep it and utilize it to his fullest extent, he will be much more well-off, and a much better person because of it, no? Your logic is moot in the vein that you wish to spread your bloodline in your image; "Replacing yourself". Though, if your only goal is to simply spread along your psychotic-genetics abound your familial field, than have at it. Just be forewarned that if you do not tend your crops, all of them will eventually wither and rot away, having accomplished absolutely nothing. ---
Yes, indeed it is. Does a poverty-stricken black father have the time to teach his children the way of the land, or will the children learn it from someone else who has the time for them? And note: My father's family was comprised of seven members, all living in one small home. Do you know what he does for a living? He works 14 hours a day fixing appliances, because his parents never had the time to apply him to life, nor encourage him to go further. My uncle, his youngest brother, had the chance to receive my grandparent's full attention, and now he makes thousands of dollars a week creating art and showcasing it. In fact, every one of my father's brothers and sisters that did not have my grandparent's full attention are now living near the poverty line, or trying to upkeep their families. Now, why would my Uncle be so successful in comparison? As stated: He had his parents all to himself. He had their encouragement, love, and support fully throughout his life. How can you justify having so many children, if so many of them aren't successful? ---
Again, claiming I'm a boy. Even when I've made much more ground for my age than you've ever done in your entire life? Even when I go out- whilst having a job, school, and hobbies- to help people much more unfortunate than I on a regular basis? Even when I have many, many college offers, employment opportunities, and means of income and support? Even when I have constructed countless opinions and arguments that always duly and justly trump your's in every sense of the word? Pathetic. Just pathetic. ---
I've already stated that my goal, if I were to have children, would be to have two. I understand the social problems a single-child faces, as I am one. However, your ideal that "more is better", is moot, as I've already explained. Pushing your children to achieve is necessary as a parent. Telling them to achieve all on their own with no support is what leads to monsters- people who do not know how to do anything correctly. When you have someone to tell you how to do something, they will do it. Having two children helps social alleviate social problems, as they will always have each other in any situation that merits that need. ---
I assume you are referring to the fact that foreigners are now settling your lands, when saying if I do not replace my numbers, I will perish? In this case: No, your race failed to upkeep itself. In fact, your race has always been failing. You are now experiencing what it feels like to have been every other race yours has invaded over countless centuries. You became weak, crippled, and distraught, due to your umpteen self-centered campaigns of dominance, which have all ended in failure for your crown, and now for your seed. "But Gard- America is being invaded by Mexicans and Blacks!", blacks are as American as I at this point. I do not care how terrible and cruel their culture is, I cannot justly say they are ruining this country, as they are as American as me, and have the freedom to be retarded as fuck if they wish it. Shall I attempt to change that, so they do not have inter-gang warfare, general decadence and degeneracy? Yes, of course. But I must also realize their race was not nearly as developed as mine when ours collided, so changing their mentality will be quite a challenge, but one that has nothing but beneficial outcomes. Now, for Mexicans- They're pretty much white. "B-But they interbreeded with blacks and natives!", they're also extremely useful and loyal under the right circumstances. I have no problems with them being a part of this country, as long as they respect other races, peoples, and organizations. Your problem in Britain, is that you do not see a brother in the eyes of a mad muslim putting up Sharia law signs. No, you do not attempt to assimilate them to your culture- you just open your doors and let them taint you very culture. I will have no numbers to replace, if my message creates millions of children out of the populace of this country. Every man is a brother to me, and as long as they respect the country they wish to live in, and respect the various cultures and races that reside within it, they are free to be here, elsewhere, or anywhere they wish to be. Case in point: I have no need to replace myself with children in mass quantities, as I have no logical way to be dominated, if my stronghold is not blood, but iron.
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
Black Shark Konto gelöscht |
|
This thread was meant to bring up some sort of debate on the issue of entitlement by race, sexuality, etc.
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
How can you debate with nazis? 
---- 
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
I am psure, that the average german would have the freedom to worship hittler and swastikas in their christmas trees.
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
|
hahaha awesome gif/simily! im the one on the right  on a serious note, if you can get through some of Tik's bullshit, like the crap with homosexuals and some right-wing propaganda, alot of what he says are true and his arguments very strong.Yours on the other hand, are weak, as always and filled with personal attacks and classless ad hominem missiles with broken gps, that never actually reach their target.But good gif though 
----
Lade...
Lade...
|
